Is
Your Agent Focused on Value to YOU, or Cost to Them?
The answer is (hopefully) --- both. Any good business person evaluates if
the expense to them is "worth" the value they receive. As your representative, however, a real estate
agent is ethically required to keep YOU in that equation --- the expense to them should be worth the value to YOU!
Let's do the math.
Say we have a 4000 sq ft home on the market for $650,000. The
Seller will pay $39,000 in commissions (using 6% as a token commission). When it doesn't sell, instead of retooling their
marketing plan, the agent recommends cutting the sale price to $600,000.
At the original $650,000 the commission take-home for your agent is about $9750
because of the commission splits. (They split the commission with the other agent who brought the buyer to your property,
so from the $39,000... the agent is now getting $19,500 after he splits with the other agent. But there is usually
another split. Your agent usually splits what's left, with their own broker... so that $19,500 is split in half
again and is now $9750.)
So,
by cutting the price to $600,000 --- the agent's commission now drops to $9000, and you could say they "lost"
$750 in commissions, between the full price of the home and reduced price. (But they're still walking away with $9000).
The Home Seller, however,
has lost $86,000 --- the $36,000 paid out in commissions, plus a $ 50,000 loss in owner's equity in his home.
Wouldn't it be better to spend $ 600.00 on a SMARTePLAN
(4000 sq ft x 15 cents per ft) to see if it sold at the at the full price first? WHO is realizing the most value in this scenario?
As a corporate marketing manager,
I recall times when a product did not sell as well as we first hoped. We re-examined & revamped our marketing approach
and I assure you, we did NOT go to the VP of Sales and tell him our marketing is just fine, he just needs to cut his price
to sell --- especially since it was our research and data that helped set the pricing in the first place.
And isn't that the same with your agent? Didn't
you hire them so they could run comps and do research in order to set the realistic sale price of your home and position it
properly in the market? Why is it OK to come to you a few months later and recommend you cut that price and lose your owner's
equity, instead of them utilizing the most effective marketing tools available to them? Is this good value to you?
There are valid reasons to reduce the price on
a listing ... but don't you want an agent to use every marketing tool available before they vaporize $50,000 or more
in your owner's equity? Don't you want an agent who views cutting price as a last resort --- instead of an essential
part of their marketing plan?
There
is a new breed of customer-centric "eAgents" that include new online eTechnologies, like SMARTePLANS, as part of
their marketing program to differentiate your home, and amplify its sale ability in the online marketplace --- for the same
6% you can easily pay for lesser service and lesser market exposure.
It's up to you to determine which Agent's marketing will deliver the most value to YOU --- do the
math! [Read "What Home Sellers Say" Look Up "Realtors Who Use SMARTePLANS"]
SMART SERVICE TO SELLERS + AGENTS = SMARTePLANS